I spent a lot of my weekend looking at potential cars to repalce my Miata with. I literally probably looked at hundreds of cars, listings and dealer websites in this area. I found two Jettas that I really liked which are at a dealer, and several that looked/sounded ok from the ad that were for sale privately. I am going to look at the better priced Jetta on Monday and see if it is as nice as the pictures and ad say it is. If it is, I am going to see if they will let me take it home overnight and have it looked at by a local mechanic, since its used. Hopefully I’ll be taking it home tonight and straight to a shop to be checked out. If everything is good, I may have found my car! It is super nice in the ad, the pictures look great, and its the highest end model they made in that year, has all the safety features and leather with tinted windows… I can’t wait to check it out in person.
If you have Verizon FIOS, and haven’t already customized your router to use better DNS Servers, do yourself a favor and do so asap. By default Verizon uses “DNS assistance” on their *.*.*.12 DNS servers. Set your router to use custom DNS servers and change the ending .12 to a .14. Alternatively, using any of the other official Verizon DNS Servers in the range of 184.108.40.206 through 220.127.116.11 is also a good bet.
If you don’t customize your DNS, the Verizon DNS assistance configuration can potentially cause issues for Tech Savy users who do VPN, host monitoring, etc. You are also helping Verizon make more money by being served ads on their DNS assistance page.
I ran into this issue with OCS 2007 and thought it might come in handy for someone in the future. Lets say you deploy OCS 2007 in your environment, and in AD you use the phone number field for the office ext, and you want to keep that format. Lets also assume you are noticing that if you use this configuration you end up with warnings in communicator saying it cannot synchronize the addressbook. When you check the event log on your OCS server you see errors and warnings about the addressbook server. You won’t find a service for this component (at least I couldn’t find it), it appears to be built-in to the OCS server software. You also find a list of invalid AD phone numbers in your C:Program FilesMicrosoft Office Communications Server 2007Web ComponentsAddress Book FilesFiles directory.
So how can you keep your internal extensions in their current format and still communicator without having to see the annoying addressbook warning. Its not simple, but the fix is not too complex to impliment. Here is what to do. This assumes that you use a format such as “x 5555” for your extensions in AD for the users in the phone number field.
First, in the OCS 2007 console, right click on the forest, and go to properties, then select voice properties. Next, click the “Add” button to setup a new default location profile. Give it a name and a description. Next, under “Normalization Rules” click the “Add” button. Give this a name also and a description. Under translation, enter “^(x|X|x |X )“ without the quotes in the “Phone pattern regular expression” box. In the next box, enter “$`” Thats a dollar sign, immediately followed by the key to the left of the number one key on the top number row of your keyboard. To test this, enter an extension in the same format as you use in AD in the “sample dialed number:“ box. If it works you should see the resulting number in the format you want in the bottom text box.
Save you changes by clicking “ok” until you are back at the console screen. Then you just need to issue some commands on the server to update the address list, which are listed below: (NOTE: CD To the directory of your abserver.exe location)
Click Start, click Run, type cmd, and then click OK.
Type net start abserver, and then press ENTER.
Type abserver.exe –regenUR, and then press ENTER.
Type abserver.exe –syncNow, and then press ENTER.
Exit and re-start communciator on your PC/laptop and it should now load with no errors or warnings and you will now see your extensions listed.
I was recently reminded about this, so I thought I’d post about it and share the knowledge. I use mostly HP hardware, so in this setup, lets say we have two HP DL585 servers for use in a Windows cluster. I also have dual fibre channel interfaces in each server. Externally lets say we have two separate fibre channel switches. For storage, its an MSA1500 external fibre channel SAN with over 1TB of RAID storage, partitioned for use in a cluster. The MSA1500 has dual controllers and each controller has its own fibre chennel interface.
To connect it all together, each server connects one of its two fibre channel interfaces to one physical SAN Switch. The MSA1500 SAN controllers each get connected to a separate physical SAN switch. The goal here is to optomize hardware redundancy and make this configuration as fault tolerant as possible. But here is where the issue comes in.
No one tells you that you need special software running on each node of the cluster to handle the hardware redundancy. If you don’t have this software in place, what you will find is that Windows will see two SAN storage arrays. One of them will be inaccessible since you can only have one physical connection active. I had to call HP support and go through several explanations of what I was trying to accomplish with all the hardware redundance before I was told about the software I needed. Its called MultiIO or “Multi Path IO”. If you do a search on the HP support website, you will find HP MPIO Basic (there are two versions, basic is fine for most people). Download this software and install on each node and amazingly you will find that things work much better. From the documentation I saw, there is no indication of needing this software, but in this kind of highly resiliant configuration it is necessary to use MPIO to control the hardware redundancy.
I am now switching all my websites over to a VPS environment. I just signed up for VPS package with my web hosting provider and will be migrating my accounts over soon. This should provide better uptime, performance, bandwidth, etc. I also get more control over the server than I’ve had in the past. At some point I may go with a dedicated server, but I think VPS will do nicely for now.
I am normally pretty busy, but lately its just been crazy! Between some website development I’m doing in my spare time, my full time job and stuff going on with Liz and the kids; its rather hectic.
We realized the other day that our washing machine was starting to leak, so we jumped on craigslist and found a nice newer set for a great price and the guy even offered to deliver. They were dropped off yesterday, so after work I installed both a new washer and dryer and tested them out. Then it was off to web work land for me, which I got carried away with and was up way too late! I skipped my normal gym night in hopes of going tonight instead. I don’t like to mess up my schedule, but this won’t be too bad, since Liz and the kinds will be busy on thursday night, so I can go thursday after work and it won’t be a big deal.
With the web work I’m doing, I am finding all sorts of neat little tricks with flash and other cool tools. I think I am going to integrate some flash stuff on my personal sites soon,
once if things slow down for me.
This is something that both annoys me and and yet I can understand its reason for existing. Have you ever subscribed to an RSS feed and its limited to only a few posts/items (lets say 15 is a standard)? I can certainly understand the need to limit RSS feeds content, there are plenty of reasons why a reasonable number for the history limit is a good idea. However, 15 is a bit low, especially on sites that offer news or updates. I recently subscribed to a feed that had posts of a humorous nature, and it limtied me to the last 15 entries. If I want to see more of the history, I have to go to their website. 15 is also a low number, for a site that may post a few times as week, it won’t take long and I’ll start to miss posts if I don’t frequently check that feed. On my blog, I allow the last 100 posts to be downloaded, and don’t mis-read me here, that is way too high, especially for a personal blog. I’d suggest something like 25 or higher for personal feeds, 50 or higher for a site that posts a few times as week in any category, and more if the site posts many times a week, or even per day.
I have been a long time user of GFI software, relevant to this post is their Mail Essentials for Exchange package. I find it to be a very powerful and easily setup anti-spam system for Exchange. I have had very little trouble with it, and it is packed with useful features. However, recently I had some configuration issues with my spam setup, with rollernet really, not even an issue with Mail Essentials, but it got me thinking about my spam filtration system.
I am now on a quest to find an open source anti-spam solution for Exchange. I’m open to Linux based solutions as a gateway of sorts, but would prefer something that resides on the Exchange server running under Windows. Don’t get me wrong, I have a great respect for SpamAssassin and other gateway type spam fitlers, but it gives the end user a much better experience if the anti-spam software can interact with the user, especially if it integrates with Outlook.
Surely there must be some kind of solution out there I could try. At the very least I might install a few different packages under Linux and route incoming mail through them, and from there go to Exchange for evaluation. I can use server virtualization to allow for an easy evaluation of various types of configurations. ASSP I hear is very good and there was one other package that I found last night that sounds promising. I think it could be beneficial to have an additional layer of spam protection at the gateway level before GFI gets the messages and does its thing. My only concern is false positives. Lots of services and companies on the internet today do NOT have the proper DNS/MX confiugration and even at a more basic level don’t have their network setup right. All these network issues can have a major impact on e-mail deliverability. Its always a risk then when dealing with spam filters that you may block legitimate messages. I am always watching spam logs to ensure that I keep an eye on how the system is doing. If web services and companies would do a little work to get their sytems in compliance with RFS’s for SMTP and DNS, and setup the proper network configuration and mail server options, it would be a much better world for mail delivery without false positives.